What the court did
The court held Initiative 2066 unconstitutional under Washington’s single-subject rule because it combined multiple distinct subjects and could not be severed.
Washington Supreme Court
Washington’s Supreme Court invalidated Initiative 2066 under the single-subject rule, changing the regulatory baseline for gas, building-code, and heat-pump planning.
Case record
The court held Initiative 2066 unconstitutional under Washington’s single-subject rule because it combined multiple distinct subjects and could not be severed.
The decision changes the regulatory baseline for gas access, building-code planning, utilities, HVAC, boilers, and heat-pump projects in Washington.
The opinion does not resolve every future gas, building-code, utility, or decarbonization dispute. Further review or rehearing may also be sought.
Primary record
This update identifies the court, posture, holding, and unresolved questions. The linked opinion remains the controlling source.
Shop On Fire is not a law firm. This publication provides general business education and commentary, not legal advice or representation. Consult qualified counsel about a specific matter.