Texas Retaining-Wall Dispute Revives Contract Claim but Loses Negligence Claim to Deadline
A Texas appellate court reinstated a contract claim over a collapsed retaining wall but held the negligence claim untimely, highlighting distinct filing and expert requirements.
Case record
Authority before analysis.
Court
Texas Eleventh Court of Appeals
Docket
The Islamic Association of the Colony and AHL Builders, LLC v. Carr Consulting, Inc., No. 11-25-00129-CV
Decision
2026-09-10
Posture
Appeal from dismissal and summary judgment; contract claim and related fee request remanded, other rulings affirmed.
Status
Texas intermediate appellate memorandum opinion. Transferred appeal applying Second Court of Appeals precedent where required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 41.3.
01
What the court did
After a retaining wall and supported parking lot failed, the project owner and contractor pursued claims against the engineer. The appellate court found their certificate of merit sufficient for the contract claim, but upheld the negligence dismissal because the refiled suit came after the two-year deadline.
02
Why operators should care
Project teams should preserve failure evidence, engage appropriate experts, and have counsel track each claim's requirements and deadline separately. Learning the potential wrongdoer's role later may not postpone accrual once a failure should prompt investigation.
03
What remains unresolved
The contract claim and related attorney-fee request return to the trial court. The court did not find the engineer liable or award the claimed $900,000 to $1.8 million. It affirmed the remaining rulings, including negligence and warranty dispositions.
Industries
General contractors
Ownership models
Issues
Construction defectsContracts and paymentWarranties and product liability
Primary record
Read the opinion.
This update identifies the court, posture, holding, and unresolved questions. The linked opinion remains the controlling source.
Shop On Fire is not a law firm. This publication provides general business education and commentary, not legal advice or representation. Consult qualified counsel about a specific matter.