What the court did
The court allowed contract and implied-covenant claims to proceed based on alleged bid acceptance, post-bid communications, and requested submissions, while rejecting unjust enrichment and other theories.
New York Appellate Division, Second Department
Post-bid communications and requested submissions may establish acceptance of a plumbing subcontract, but an owner is not automatically liable on an implied-payment theory.
Case record
The court allowed contract and implied-covenant claims to proceed based on alleged bid acceptance, post-bid communications, and requested submissions, while rejecting unjust enrichment and other theories.
Bid records, post-bid conduct, and reliance evidence can materially affect payment disputes for plumbing, gas, and other specialty contractors.
No breach, liability, or damages finding was made. The surviving claims return for further proceedings.
Primary record
This update identifies the court, posture, holding, and unresolved questions. The linked opinion remains the controlling source.
Shop On Fire is not a law firm. This publication provides general business education and commentary, not legal advice or representation. Consult qualified counsel about a specific matter.